The arable land over Hog Hill has been farmed for cereal crops. Just outside the A110 orbital road, horses graze in fenced pastures. Similarly, livestock are licensed to roam on the parcel of green belt meadows south of this road, which slope down towards the woods around
To the east is Enfield Golf Course with rolling greens visible from
Allotments are worked off Trentwoodside and
Our residents endure or ignore the inevitable road traffic noise, magnitude of which depends on proximity to main routes and time of day. This is comparable to adjacent wards.
There are regular flights overhead to and from London Heathrow and City
Green Belt Encroachment
Highlands' fields are under persistent threat of obliteration. They are London Diocese Land on the south side of the orbital road between Enfield and Oakwood. The leasehold was acquired from the Church of England by Fairview Homes on the expectation that planning permission would be granted for new construction. A future housing estate, consisting of more than 300 houses and a school has been proposed.
The area is already saturated with schools and houses, accessed by busy thoroughfares and supplied by potentially overused utilities and services. Of equal importance is the short sighted and lazy stratagem of squandering designated ‘green belt’ land, which would blight our landscape and threaten wild life habitats. Meanwhile the Enfield Borough Local Plan Revision process continues into 2020.
There is strong opposition from local residents and neighbours on environmental grounds. Our Local Councillors have been resolutely supportive. 1,700 people responded to the first consultation. At the end of 1919, Mayor Khan stood up to the Planning Inspectorate and refused to dilute Green Belt protection in the New London Plan. (He did agree to reduce housing targets which, if affirmed in the final plan, should ease pressure on Enfield.)
The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has featured our Fields on their site register of threatened green belt land. You can find the London map under the following link: http://www.cprelondon.org.uk/resources/item/2288-protect-london-map. Click on the nearest red map balloon marker to see the record for Enfield.
Enfield RoadWatch This Campaign Group reformed in 2015 to deal with the threat. They have their own website (linked behind the heading). You can keep up with all news and features on its pages. A second public consultation, this time on the actual Draft Local Plan, is anticipated. The updated timeline will be posted on their website. Join the ERW e-mail list so they can let you know when action is required. Just write to email@example.com. And why not ‘like’ ERW on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to keep up with the rumours and announcements.
South Lodge Farm: Under Scrutiny
It has been our privilege, in past years, to accommodate farming in Highlands Ward. We have enjoyed the reassurance of knowing our rural landscape was nearby. Recent disregard by the owner of South Lodge Farm for any positive land maintenance has been a matter of regret. Food production is more important than ever and we nurture the hope that crop cultivation will return.
Activities at the farm (adjacent to the A110 Enfield road) have since been a source of vexation to our residents. In the mid 1990’s plans were put forward to convert the site to a garden centre. The application was refused so the occupier kept pigs instead, subjecting the neighbourhood to offensive smells; which led to a banning order.
After livestock was withdrawn there followed a period of neglect. More recently, a chronic nuisance was caused by storage of numerous, unsightly white refrigerated vans and turning or parking of extended heavy goods vehicles. This was compounded by deterioration of site infrastructure and occupation by strangers to our community.
Council ‘Stop’ and Enforcement Orders, were thwarted by attempts at diverting justice through retrospective and inappropriate planning applications. One of these proposed a change of use to 'storage and distribution of vehicles' with elevation of another large shed. This would have impaired general outlook, blighted our landscape and reintroduced problems already endured with access (to and from Enfield Road) through a gateway not intended for operations on an industrial scale and intensity.
A further revised, retrospective planning application was eventually accepted, in July 2017, under conditions designed to ensure compliance with Green Belt policy and in the interests of visual amenity. Permission was granted for limited storage of vehicles within the existing barn on the understanding that toilet facilities would be permanently re-located inside the warehouse building. Also, Portacabins (and other makeshift structures) would be removed and no activities or storage of vehicles associated with use would take place on any outside areas of the site. Crucially, no more than 20 Long-Wheelbase type vans (or equivalent size) and 2 cars associated with use should be contained within the site at any one time.
However, this was not a permanent solution. Increasing, obstructive vehicle movements involving transporters and parking, overnight or for longer periods, have clogged side-roads adjacent to the premises (notably along Greystoke Gardens). Workers’ cars have been parked on South Lodge Crescent. Conspicuous and substantial littering and tipping of rubbish have plagued verges and clearings in the woodland around lakeside and the top of Lowther Drive.
All of this has been associated with overspill activities at South Lodge Farm. Suspicions have been aired about limits of use being exceeded on site and unauthorised sub-letting to several Licensees who, in turn, are conducting their trade unethically and, perhaps, unlawfully. Council workers and volunteer teams have carried out major clearances but yet more rubbish accumulates. There is an ever present anxiety that abuse of the South Lodge estate will bring it into unwelcome prominence and create an excuse for re-development. The longer term fear is that urban sprawl will push the agricultural green belt back and, ultimately, become united with the unrelenting noise and chaos of the M25.
Early in 2019 Council Enforcement Officers visited the occupiers again and made clear that current operations are not acceptable. Storage of commercial vehicles off-site, no matter how short-term, will not be tolerated. Officers were then informed that the business will be relocating to a new site in Nazeing at the beginning of March 2019.
Further investigations revealed that a vehicle repair business has been established in the barn, without the benefit of planning permission. The unauthorised business owner alleges that the site owner will apply for planning permission to change use. In the absence of this the business must be banned and the operator expelled. Nevertheless if vans are taxed, MOT’d and insured then there is nothing in law to prevent them being parked on the road.
In contravention of conditions imposed in 2019 by the Council numerous vehicles (some almost too large to squeeze in and out while obstructing traffic) continue to be parked (or dumped) outside sheds and there are concerns about what materials hazardous to our environment might have been leaked or improperly stored. Enforcement officers visited the site on several occasions since the end of November and, we understand, are in the process of ‘Enforcement and Stop’ relating to use and storage outside to the front, side and rear. No significant improvement was detected early in 2020.
This is the text-only version of this page. Click here to see this page with graphics.
Edit this page | Manage website
Make Your Own Website: 2-Minute-Website.com